|
That Erl Kodra Reply with Prof. Artan Fuga Listening to Artan Fuga at Sokol Balla, one got the impression that the professor was talking about the opposition of a hypothetical country that has some problems, but again the fault for the bad state of the country lies precisely with it, since they are not able to engage the gray electorate or create the right spirit for change - and that the cause must be sought within it - in the way of the organism, in the structures that do not work, the form of making the opposition, the political and ideological program, and finally, the successive mistakes since he left the system burning parliamentary mandates.
At first glance, Fuga's thoughts Cambodia WhatsApp Number Data resonated completely with everything that has been said these years about and about the opposition, despite the fact that the rich vocabulary and the way of reasoning had a special color. It seems clear that the professor is a master in his field, and as such, even for special reasons, he can raise influential narratives in public opinion, especially in the final determination of the sole culprit for the dire situation in which the country is. But was the Professor right? His criticisms would stand completely if Edi Rama did not exist at all, or if Albania was not the way it is, or worse still, the professor's thoughts were addressed to a hypothetical country that we do not know at all.
Otherwise, his criticism cannot be justified, as long as he criticizes the opposition by detaching it from the environment, or worse, as if it lives in a society with some problems, but which still works. But it is not like that. Albania is a small country with a tragic past - with a fractured society - with rivers of blood in the middle - with a part of the population at the limits of survival - with a society criminalized at the core - with institutions dependent and captured by the mafia and politics - and above all - with a prime minister like Edi Rama - the biggest demagogue after Enver Hoxha. But some fatal questions leave no doubt that Fuga's approach is at least inappropriate, as long as the professor himself, as a good professional, is assumed to know the socio-political and economic reality of the country.
|
|